Rush Limbaugh: Shutdown 2013 mediation

There has to be an appreciation for the value of conflict resolution as a legitimate political tool.  Photo: DC Negotiations

WASHINGTON, October 13, 2013 – A skilled mediator and negotiator would not be put off by President Obama’s and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s refusal to sit down with John Boehner and Republican legislators to negotiate an end to Shutdown 2013. Getting the parties to the table is often the first hurdle to overcome in a conflict of this magnitude.

Additionally, there has to be an appreciation for the value of conflict resolution as a legitimate political tool. 

SEE RELATED: Mediating Miley Cyrus and Sinead O’Connor feud

Former President Jimmy Carter understood the value of conflict resolution and importance of face saving when he facilitated the Camp David Accords agreements signed by Egyptian President Anwar El Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin 35 years ago.

Using shuttle diplomacy, mediation and other non violent methods, President Carter was able to facilitate peaceful agreements that eventually led to a peace treaty between Israel and Egypt.

President Sadat and Prime Minister Begin were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1978 for their courageous work. 

If President Sadat and Prime Minister Menachem could put aside their differences and negotiate an agreement, why can’t President Obama and Reid follow a similar path and negotiate with Boehner and Republican legislators? 

SEE RELATED: Mediating Shutdown 2013: President Obama’s role as victim or bully

Clearly, the President and Congress’ low ratings are an indication that change is needed. According to the gallop poll editor “Americans are now more likely to mention dysfunctional government than the economy or jobs as the most important problem facing the U.S.”    

Rush Limbaugh commented that “conflict resolution” essentially has no utilitarian value, based on his purported understanding of what he believes conflict resolution is or is not. In reviewing  the “Bully-Bully” documentary on peer-peer bullying, Rush said “one of the things this movie Bully does, without intending to, is demonstrate that conflict resolution as a class is worthless.” 

When a radio show caller complimented Rush on the accuracy of the information he disseminates, Rush reminded his audience that “right now it’s [his accuracy] been documented as almost always right 99.7% of the time.”

I have tremendous respect for Rush and his accomplishments in the media. However, in all fairness, Rush has not given conflict resolution a chance. Notwithstanding there have been a number of people who have misrepresented conflict resolution, it works.

SEE RELATED: The White House and Congress need a mediator

Conflict Resolution is an umbrella term for facilitated peaceful resolution of a conflict or dispute. It’s an alternative to bullies “beating the crap” out of people because they annoy them.  Moreover, giving a bully a “beat down” only reinforces bad behavior. 

Programs like Olweus are evidenced based and use a positive behavior approach to stop bullying and correct peer relations.

At the end of the recorded review of the Bully-Bully, Rush joking says that it was suggested that he forward a copy of the movie to President Obama.   

 Why not call for President Obama and Congress to consider mediation to end Shutdown 2013?    The only caveat is that the mediator be independent and leave his or her advocacy hat at the door. 

The third part of the Camp David Accords was criticized by the United Nations because a framework for peace in the Middle East was written without the participation of all the parties involved

A mediated Shutdown 2013 agreement would not commit parties who did not participate in negotiations. 

Tell me what you think about the possibility of an independent mediator to facilitate peaceful resolution to Shutdown 2013.

All comments are welcome and valued.

Also, feel free to ask me questions about conflict resolution and mediation.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Why Can’t We Get Along?
blog comments powered by Disqus
Millicent Carvalho-Grevious

Dr. Millicent Carvalho-Grevious, is the founder and principal of Pennsylvania Conflict Resolution and Mediation Services, Inc. She has mediated conflicts for over 30 years, providing services in a variety of venues for private and public entities, including the United States Postal Service, the Office of Dispute Resolution of the Department of Education, and the office of Employer Support for the National Guard and Reserve. She was one of 14 conflict resolution experts from 11 nations invited to Chongqing, China in 2009 to participate in a forum titled, “Responding to the Challenges of Financial Crisis and Building Social Harmony.” Previously, she served as Director/Program Chair of Urban Studies and Community at LaSalle University, Associate Professor and Chair of Department of Social Work at Virginia Union University and Associate Professor and Social Work Department Chair at Delaware State University. She earned a Doctor of Philosophy, Master of Social Work and Master of Law and Social Policy degrees at Bryn Mawr College and Master of Education (Counselor Education) at Boston University and Bachelor of Arts at LaSalle University.

Contact Millicent Carvalho-Grevious


Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus