Obama’s Israel policies are making Netanyahu stronger

Though Barack Obama did not intend to make Israel stronger with his foreign policy, his incompetence has given Benjamin Netanyahu more independence. Photo: Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu (Photo: Washington Times)

CHARLOTTE, December 19, 2013 – Without realizing it, Barack Obama’s stumbling, inept efforts at foreign policy may have been the best thing to happen to Israel in decades.

Much like the slip-of-the-tongue blunder by Secretary of State John Kerry during the Syrian crisis, which resulted in the red-line being withdrawn and a trap-door escape for Obama, the president’s pro-Islamic approach to foreign policy may have made Israel stronger.

SEE RELATED: Bahrain no longer a safe haven in a region gone mad

That does not mean the Middle East is less complicated, more stable, less dangerous or a walk in the park for Israel. To the contrary. Israel now faces greater challenges than ever before in its efforts to be an oasis in the desert of Islamic radicalism that surrounds it.

What Obama’s strategies do mean, however, is that by virtue of the fact that Israel must now become more resourceful to face its daily struggles in the region, it will also likely become more capable of handling those demands by themselves. Less interference may be a good thing for Israel in the long run.

Whatever Barack Obama’s motivations may have been to reject traditional allies in the region and generally throw U.S. support to rogue regimes, Israel has benefited by those actions. Though relations between the United States and Israel may be less cordial than they have been in the past, Obama has inadvertently given Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu greater control over Israel’s destiny.

The Middle East is a complex region. It is no place for an inexperienced academic with an Islamic upbringing and idealistic philosophies to be fine-tuning tribal alliances and differences that have been raging for fourteen centuries. While Netanyahu may not have all the answers, Obama doesn’t even have a clue. Consequently, Israel must counter current White House global initiatives in order to preserve its very existence. Obama’s bull-in-a-china-shop approach to international affairs has, therefore, made Israel less reliant on the West in general and the U.S. in particular for its very survival.

SEE RELATED: Why must we make excuses for the brothers Tsaranaev?

Whether Obama is naïve or incompetent matters little in the overall scheme of Middle East relations because the result is ultimately the same. Difficult as it may be to comprehend that Obama could destabilize an already unstable situation even further, the president has legitimized dysfunctional governments to a degree that has emboldened Islamic radicalism as never before.

Some observers may ask, if that is the case, then why have we not seen more terrorist activity in the homeland in recent months and years? The question is valid, but the answer is not complicated There is no need for violence. Terrorism comes in many shapes and forms. If done internally, which is far less visible, from an economic perspective, it may not be as dramatic but it is significantly more effective. Then why bother with bombs?

Five years into Obama’s rudderless administration, the world recognizes that no matter how bad things may get, the president believes he can talk his way through any situation. Diplomacy and statesmanship are usually a good thing, but Obama is neither a diplomat nor a statesman. Sometimes action is required. Not preferred, but necessary. Talk is cheap, so they say.

So long as he believes he has the upper hand, Barack Obama will talk with anybody or to anybody. It is only when he is on the short end of a debate that he pulls his head into his shell like a turtle while he figures ways to bypass the conversations he does not want to have.

SEE RELATED: Iran implications are dire and go beyond nuclear weapons

Had the American people not had half a decade of listening to Barack Obama’s rhetoric, the words might still resonate today. That is no longer true, because we have come to recognize that those words are filled with half-truths, misrepresentations and lies. The words have lost their power.

Benjamin Netanyahu understands all of that. A prerequisite to success in Israel is to be intuitive. Netanyahu sees right through Obama’s so-called “transparency” and, while the news may be reporting a wedge between the U.S. and Israel, the fact is that the Israelis may have been given the gift of strength and independence through American incompetence

Bob Taylor has been traveling the world for more than 30 years as a writer and award winning television producer focusing on international events, people and cultures around the globe. Taylor is founder of The Magellan Travel Club(www.MagellanTravelClub.com).  

Read more of What in the World and Bob Taylor at The Washington Times Communities

Follow us:  @wtcommunities on Twitter



This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from What in the World
blog comments powered by Disqus
Bob Taylor

Bob Taylor has been travel writer for more than three decades. Following a career as an award winning sports producer/anchor, Taylor’s media production business produced marketing presentations for Switzerland Tourism, Rail Europe, the Finnish Tourist Board, Japan Railways Group, the Swedish Travel & Tourism Council and the Swiss Travel System among others. He is founder of The Magellan Travel Club (www.MagellanTravelClub.com) and his goal is to visit 100 countries or more during his lifetime.


Contact Bob Taylor


Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus