LOS ANGELES, Janaury 21, 2013 — A joke about God says that he created the world in six days, and spent the seventh say wondering how he did it. President Barack Obama reached godlike status for saving the world, yet those worshiping him still cannot articulate what he actually did or how he did it.
On January 21st, 2013, Obama celebrates his second inauguration. Based on his behavior, this is day 1,461 of his first inauguration. His entire life is a celebration of himself.
Nevertheless, he somehow found the will to take time out from relaxing to praise himself publicly before going back to accomplishing nothing.
He will lay out an “agenda” for a second term, which will involve “forward,” “fairness,” and a “balanced approach.” He will repeat these platitudes in his 2013 State of the Useless address.
Obama desires a “national conversation,” provided that only people agreeing with him speak. A real constructive dialogue would occur if everyone took an inaugural oath requiring conversation be about policy. The last two decades has seen liberals demand everything they say be taken at face value simply because they said so. For true dialogue, hard issues deserve serious, honest analysis.
One fact that must be respected is that no significant policy creates a measurable immediate effect. There is a lag time.
Strip away Obama haters and sycophants, and focus on policy.
President Obama “saved America from the next Great Depression.” He “saved the auto industry,” a major economic cog.
How? What specific policies did he enact that had anything to do with healing the American economy? Can anyone name the actual policies?
President George W. Bush and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson created the $787 billion TARP package to save the financial sector before Obama took office. Obama created his own $1.3 trillion dollar “stimulus” package. A more modest version made it through the Democratic Congress. It did not do what Obama himself said it would.
The economy was shedding 750,000 jobs per month when he took over, but reversal began before his own stimulus was enacted. Timelines are non-partisan. Even somebody as glorious as Obama cannot solve problems before taking office or get credit for being the only man in history to enact policies without a lag time. The economy did rebound from the depths during his tenure, but before he could have possibly contributed anything positive or negative.
Since recoiling from the brink, the economy has stagnated his entire four years. This is more than enough time for scrutinizing his policies. If things were as bad as described, then the rebound should have been significantly better. Reaganomics sharply reversed the Carter economy. The actual policies were supply-side tax cuts. President Obama enacted healthcare and environmental policies. The former increased the debt while the latter made no positive economic contribution. Bailed out automobile companies are still suffering. Companies that refused bailout money are healthier.
If the “Obama saved the world” narrative is going to be rammed down American throats, it is perfectly reasonable to inquire as to how he actually did this. If the Obama narrative is true, every leader on Earth should learn from him.
Liberals will respond by violating the rules of civilized conversation. Questioning the accepted liberal dogma of “Clinton good, Bush evil, Obama godlike” leads to the inevitable charges of racism, bias, and other sinister motives.
How about letting policy discussions finally be about policy? What did President Obama do? Would it have happened without him? If not, then he is the one indispensable man the world truly has been waiting for. If not, then his significance is vastly overstated.
Platitudes, slogans, and talking points are not policies. “Cleaning up the mess” of his predecessor is nonsense unless one can state exactly what policies caused the mess to begin with. Tax cuts in 2001 and 2003 have nothing to do with the financial crisis of 2008 in the same way that Clintonomics does not deserve credit for the 1990s dot-com economy or blame for the 2000 crash.
If liberals cannot name a single successful Obama economic policy, then maybe it is possible that he has never had one. Maybe his supporters despise his predecessor so much that they do not care what Obama does. They love Obama for merely being.
This is great for liberal partisans, but offers nothing from a policy standpoint. Without substantive explanation, Obamanomics offers nothing positive that anybody anywhere can learn from.
This is Inauguration 2013, a hollow celebration of failed nothingness beyond liberal self-regard. Liberals need this illusion to tide themselves over during the self-worship gap between the Golden Globes and Oscars.
Brooklyn born, Long Island raised, and now living in Los Angeles, Eric Golub is a politically conservative columnist, author, public speaker, satirist and comedian. Eric is the author of the book trilogy “Ideological Bigotry, “Ideological Violence,” and “Ideological Idiocy.”
Eric is 100% alcohol, tobacco, drug, and liberalism free. Follow Eric on Twitter @TYGRRRREXPRESS. Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.