No silver lining for Paul: Santorum helps Santorum and Romney

Comment | Tweet | Share | | | Email | More |
The suspension of Santorum's campaign is great for Romney and good for Santorum. It's not so great for Ron Paul. Photo: Associated Press

NATCHITOCHES, La., April 13, 2012 — Rick Santorum’s decision to suspend his campaign was met by an outpouring of good will and kind words from his opponents. Mitt Romney was conciliatory. Ron Paul’s online supporters, who last week hardly considered Santorum a true American, are now enthusiastic in their praise of him as the other principled candidate whose supporters should now support Paul.

Only Newt Gingrich seemed sour, thoughts of what might have been had Santorum dropped out when he told him to adding to his sense of aggrievement. 

After firing a third of his staff a couple of weeks ago, Gingrich hopes that Santorum’s departure will resuscitate his campaign. He’s now the “only true conservative” left in the race, as he sees it, and his supporters (aside from Callista, who’s the other?) want him to stay in it. At last he has his chance to face Romney one-on-one. 

But of course he does not. Ron Paul is still in the race, and the Gingrich campaign is dead. Before Santorum dropped out, Gingrich declared that he and Romney could heal the rift between them and that he could “enthusiastically” support Romney. That is despite the fact that he thinks Romney is a dishonest, “Etch A Sketch,” not-really-conservative candidate.

Ron Paul’s supporters are convinced that their man will reap the benefits of going one-on-one against Romney, along with much of Santorum’s support and some delegates. Like most of the media, they have started acting as if Gingrich doesn’t exist, and for practical purposes he does not. But Santorum, who was on icy terms with Paul while he was in the campaign, is probably contemplating a 2016 run, and endorsing Paul would kill that in the crib. 

Because he is only suspending his campaign, Santorum’s delegates remain pledged to him. Delegates have minds of their own and can’t be bought and bargained for like beads at a bazaar. However, Santorum will have some influence with them, so his endorsement matters. He can’t endorse Paul, and Gingrich, deep in a financial hole and desperate for money, can do nothing for him. Only Romney can help him retire his debt and put him on good footing to face 2016. If he plays this intelligently (or cynically, if you prefer), he can only endorse Romney. He will do it once Romney gives him what he needs - a promise of financial assistance, and probably a prime speaking slot at the convention. 

If he waits too long, Romney won’t need him for the nomination, though Santorum’s support will still be important for November. Romney already has more than half the delegates he needs for the nomination, and unless Paul does something astonishing, he’ll get them.

Paul gains nothing from Santorum’s departure; he only loses. The Paul strategy was to work the state conventions, acquire more delegates than his official count (his supporters claim he has over 200, not the 51 he’s won in the primaries and caucuses), make sure that delegates pledged to other candidates are his supporters, deny Romney the delegates to win in the first vote at the convention, then, after the pledged delegates vote for whom they must in the first round, win in the next round of voting.

With Santorum’s departure, that won’t happen. Some of Romney’s delegates may be Paul supporters, but if they have to vote for Romney in the first round, they’ll never get a chance to vote for Paul in a second round. Without Santorum to bleed away delegates, Paul can’t force a second vote at the convention.

Santorum’s departure destroys Paul’s convention strategy, and it can’t bring the dead Gingrich campaign back to life. It’s a pure win for Romney. But what about for Santorum?

Santorum is the second winner this week. He had no chance of winning the nomination, and only a slightly better chance of blocking Romney. If he’d waited much longer to leave, he’d have earned Party enmity for prolonging the campaign beyond reason. If he’d lost in Pennsylvania for a second time, his credibility as a candidate would have been demolished. 

Santorum pointedly did not praise Romney when he announced his departure from the race. He didn’t mention Romney at all. That could be viewed as petty disrespect, but it also telegraphed his intentions: Romney has to buy his support. If Romney expects to have a chance in November, he’ll need it. 

 

James Picht is the Senior Editor for Communities Politics and teaches economics at the Louisiana Scholars’ College in Natchitoches, La., where he went to take a break from working in Moscow and Washington. But he fell in love with the town and with the professor of Romance languages, so there he stayed. Now he teaches, annoys his children, and makes jalapeno lemonade. His mother told him to write more. He tweets, hangs out on Facebook, and has a blog he totally neglects at pichtblog.blogspot.com.

 

 


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Stimulus That!
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Jim Picht

James Picht is an economist, a husband, and a father. He's also a former music major and classically trained pianist, a church organist, and a part-time jewelry maker. He thought he wanted to be a scientist and got a degree in biology/chemistry (University of Utah), but a stint in a genetics lab sent him running to graduate studies in Slavic Languages (UT Austin). A computer error landed him in an economics class one summer, after the first hour he was in love with the subject, and five years later he earned a PhD in it (Texas A&M). He spent the next several years working as a contractor for the U.S. government and international development banks with assignments in Kiyiv, Moscow, Sarajevo, and Central Asia. The work was interesting, the travel more so, but he got tired of cold winters and cabbage soup. So he moved to Louisiana and got himself a teaching job, a wife, and two children. He teaches economics and Russian literature at the Louisiana Scholars' College at Northwestern State University, Louisiana's designated honors college. He finds his life even more interesting than before, but without the winters, the cabbage, or the Mafia protection.

Contact Jim Picht

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Who We Are

This is the Communities section at WashingtonTimes.com. Individual contributors are responsible for their content, which is not edited by The Washington Times. The opinions of Communities writers do not necessarily reflect the views of, nor are they endorsed by, The Washington Times. Contact Us with questions or comments.

Get The Most Up-To-Date News From The Washington Times Communities.

* required
Question of the Day

Should the Government track and store American's personal data in the name of security?

View results

Featured
  • Understanding Health & Addiction

    Covering a real world perspective on the various topics associated with health and addiction issues people want to know about.

  • Run, Karla, Run!

    Notes from a running nerd: musings and more on all things running.

  • Morning Market Maven

    Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.

  • Political Potpourri

    A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.

  • What in the World

    In a world that is increasingly complex, we need to seek greater awareness of the blending of cultures and America's changing role in a global community.

  • Curtain Up!

    Classical music and the performing arts: news and reviews you can use.

Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus