Georgia proposes legislation to protect Confederate monuments

Legislation in Georgia would make it unlawful to hide Confederate monuments Photo: Todd DeFeo

ATLANTA, Feb. 26, 2013 – Legislation pending in the Georgia state general assembly would make it illegal for anyone to “mutilate, deface, defile, or abuse contemptuously any publicly owned monument,” including those honoring the Confederate States of America.

The proposal, House Bill 91, mandates that publicly owned monuments located on public property be kept on display in a prominent place. Concealing monuments would be a misdemeanor, and anyone who “damages, destroys, or loses a monument or that takes or removes a monument without replacing it” would be on the hook for any repair costs.

The measure, filed by state Rep. Tommy Benton, R-Jefferson, defines a monument as including plaques, markers and statues “constructed and located with the intent of being permanently displayed and perpetually maintained” and “dedicated to a historical entity, event or series of events.” The measure is currently pending in the state house.

“We’re not saying they can’t move them,” the Atlanta Daily World newspaper quoted Benton as saying. “We’re just saying they can’t just put them in a field somewhere.”

Georgia is home to hundreds of monuments commemorating the Civil War, including those dedicated to Confederate soldiers and the battles fought in and around Atlanta. Benton’s proposal specifically prohibits the obstruction of the giant carving on the side of Stone Mountain that depicts a trio of prominent Confederates – Gen. Robert E. Lee, Gen. “Stonewall” Jackson and Confederate President Jefferson Davis.

The proposed legislation does allow monuments to be removed for “preservation, protection, and interpretation.” However, a “monument shall not be relocated to a museum, cemetery, or mausoleum unless it was originally placed at such a location.”

The bill also allows monuments to be relocated to make way for expansions to buildings and roads. But, the monument must be moved “to a site of similar prominence, honor, visibility, availability, and access within the same jurisdiction.”

Should the measure pass, it would also be unlawful to “obscure any privately owned monument … located on privately owned property.”


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Sightseers' Delight
blog comments powered by Disqus
Todd DeFeo

Todd DeFeo jouned The Washington Times Communities in May 2012. He covers travel and Georgia. A marketing professional who never gave up his award-winning journalistic ways, DeFeo revels in the experience and the fact that every place has a story to tell. He also serves as editor of The Travel Trolley.


Contact Todd DeFeo


Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus