Kerry can take credit for the next war

Israeli acquiescence to Palestinian demands always leads to bloodshed Photo: Secretary of State Kerry and Palestinian President Abbas at a meeting in Jordan

JERUSALEM, July 24, 2013 — On Friday, just as he was about to return to the United States from Jordan, Secretary of State John Kerry announced that he had finally gotten the Palestinian Authority and Israel to agree to resume “stalled peace talks.”

His sigh of relief was almost as palpable as it was audible. After a round of media reports about imminent consent on both sides to negotiate a “two-state solution,” Kerry was desperate to make the false rumors come true. Otherwise, he was going to have to go back to Washington empty-handed and with considerable egg on his face.

What he did, instead, was to cook up a hasty omelet.

“The agreement is still in the process of being formalized,” he said, modifying the so-called good news. “So we are absolutely not going to talk about any of the elements now.”

But he did want to assure everyone that it was a done deal — not a peace deal, mind you, nor anything close to actual consent on the part of the Palestinian Authority even to engage in negotiations. Still, there was enough ostensible acquiescence for Kerry to work with.

In order not to lose the illusion of momentum, he scheduled a tentative meeting in Washington DC at some point in the near future between P.A. professional negotiator Saeb Erekat and Israeli Justice Minister-cum-peace-processer Tzipi Livni (accompanied by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confidante, attorney Yitzhak Molcho.)

No sooner had Kerry boarded his plane, however, than the Palestinians began to reiterate their terms — again, not for peace, but for talks. These pre-conditions include an Israeli commitment to a withdrawal to the 1967 borders; a settlement freeze; and the release of 104 terrorists with gallons of innocent Israeli blood on their hands. As was reported by Israel’s Channel 10 news, Netanyahu has capitulated on the terrorist issue — though his intention is to release “only” 82.

Meanwhile, senor P.A. official Nabil Shaath told the Maan News Agency on Sunday that a resumption of negotiations “depends on two steps we asked the American side to agree on. If they agree, we will go to the next step, which is preliminary negotiations in Washington to discuss the rules and the terms of direct negotiations.”

Though he did not specify the nature of these “steps,” one can assume that peace is nowhere in the vicinity of the ladder, let alone at the top.

This is a safe assumption based on vast experience. The Palestinians never have relinquished their ultimate goal, which is not statehood, but the demise of Israel. Hamas readily admits and acts on this. The P.A. also acts on it but only spells it out in Arabic. It is a key part of their overall strategy.

Indeed, as Kerry was declaring his success at getting the sides to come to the table on Friday, P.A. Minister of Religious Affairs Mahmoud Al-Habbash was giving a whopper of a sermon — broadcast on P.A. television and reported by Palestinian Media Watch — in which he explained the wisdom of reaching fraudulent peace pacts with Israel.

“…The Palestinian leadership’s sense of responsibility towards its nation made it take political steps about 20 years ago [signing the Oslo Accords],” he orated. “Despite …much opposition by some, it brought us to where we are today: We have a [Palestinian] Authority and the world recognizes the [Palestinian] state.

“All this never would have happened through Hamas’ impulsive adventure, but only through the wisdom of the leadership, conscious action, consideration, and walking the right path, which leads to achievement, exactly like the Prophet [Muhammad] did in the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah.”

 “The Hudaybiyyah peace treaty,” explains the PMW report, “was a 10-year truce that Muhammad, Islam’s Prophet, made with the Quraish Tribe of Mecca….two years into the truce, Muhammad attacked and conquered Mecca.”

The sermon ends with Al-Habbash asserting: “This is the example; this is the model.”

The late Abba Eban, who called the ’67 lines the “borders of Auschwitz,” once said that “the Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.” Many complacent Israelis employ this quote in relation to peace negotiations with the Palestinians. “Nothing to worry about,” they say. “The Palestinians always screw up and storm off, no matter what Israel concedes.”

The trouble is that the form such tantrums take is the slaughter of Israeli civilians, alongside the Israeli leadership’s steadfast adherence to its territorial and other concessions.

This is not a recipe for peace. It is a guarantee of war. Kerry can feel free to take full credit for what he is precipitating.


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Right Angles
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Ruthie Blum

 Ruthie Blum is a pull-no-punches, conservative, Israeli-American columnist for Israel Hayom,  and the author of “To Hell in a Handbasket: Carter, Obama, and the ‘Arab Spring.’”

Contact Ruthie Blum

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus