JERUSALEM, April 9, 2013 ― U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry arrived in Israel yesterday for his third trip to the region since he took office on February 1, and for the second time in the last two weeks. The public impetus for these visits is the urgency he feels in the face of the “clock ticking” towards a point of no return concerning Iran.
Too bad the deadline he has set for himself has nothing to do with the Iranian nuclear program. No, on that score he is confident that his boss, President Barack Obama, has everything under control.
“All options are on the table,” Kerry reiterated on Monday, following his participation in the Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’ Remembrance Day ceremony at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem. But diplomacy, he stressed, is still the preferred route.
He’s right about one thing: Diplomacy is certainly Iran’s preference, particularly in light of North Korea’s military muscle-flexing, which is testing the waters for a buoyed Tehran.
In fact, the real reason for Kerry’s country-hopping is to reignite peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. To this end, first he flew to Istanbul on Sunday, where he made an appeal to the Turkish government to “play a role” in pushing the process forward.
To say that Turkey playing a part in the peace process is delusional would be to diminish the depth of its derangement. Turkey has been making overtures to Hamas in Gaza and remains hostile to Israel, in spite of Obama’s brokering a restoration of ties between the two countries during his own visit to Jerusalem last month. And though a group of Israeli diplomats is scheduled to go to Ankara on Thursday, the purpose of the delegation is to discuss the multi-millions in compensation to be paid to the families of the Turkish radicals who were killed during the “Free Gaza” flotilla raid in 2010, not to talk about peace.
SEE RELATED: Obama and Kerry resort to juvenile diplomacy
Meanwhile, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu made it clear to Kerry that Israel would have to meet a stringent set of preconditions before Turkey would agree to kiss and make up. These include lifting the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza.
Even Israeli Justice Minister and negotiation coordinator Tzipi Livni, known for her almost religious faith in the ability to achieve a peace deal with the Palestinians, didn’t think that Turkish mediation was a good idea.
In any case, Kerry’s first stop after arriving from Turkey on Sunday evening was Ramallah. There he met with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. The contents of that meeting were not released to the media, but Palestinian officials who wished to remain nameless leaked (or lied about) two interesting items. One was the assertion that the Obama administration is softening its position with regard to reconciliation between Abbas’ Fatah faction and Hamas. Another was that the Palestinian Authority had no intention of canceling efforts to sue Israel in the International Criminal Court regarding Israeli settlements – though“we are [temporarily] freezing them.”
The next morning, Kerry held talks with Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, but at the American consulate in Jerusalem, not in Ramallah. This is because Fayyad is about to be fired by Abbas, and the expression “bad blood” in the Middle East has a more literal meaning than it does in the West. Still, Kerry can’t help Fayyad; nor does Fayyad have the authority to discuss deals of any kind with anyone.
SEE RELATED: Jon Stewart rips Muslim Brotherhood after Youssef incident
Another pointless get-together was that which Kerry had with Israeli President Shimon Peres. Peres may be a favorite on Capitol Hill, but he is only a figure-head in Jerusalem. So his chat with Kerry was undoubtedly a repetition of the usual mantras. This was indicated by the remarks Kerry made to the press when the two peace partners (Kerry and Peres, that is) were done with their pow-wow.
“I have no illusions about difficulties,” Kerry said. “But you have to believe in the possibilities in order to get there, and you and I believe in them and I am convinced there is a road ahead.” He did not mention that this was the road to hell.
This proves what we already know about Kerry: He is not going to let facts get in the way of his foreign policy. He is a man on a mission, and nothing is going to stop him, not even rockets from Gaza that sent Holocaust mourners in southern Israel running for bomb shelters smack in mid-ceremony.
But a negotiated “two-state solution” is what Kerry was hired to execute, after all – well, that, and making the world safe from climate change. That, too, is a futile endeavor, but at least the weather is neutral. The Palestinians, on the other hand, have a political-religious agenda on which Israel is not even penciled in.
Ruthie Blum is the author of “To Hell in a Handbasket: Carter, Obama, and the ‘Arab Spring.’”
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.