Fiscal Cliff: Warren Buffett is right, raising income threshold will save families

As the nation titters on falling off the looming Fiscal Cliff, families earning slightly above $250,000 are not necessarily rich & ought to be spared imminent tax hikes after the Photo: AP / Daniel Roland

WASHINGTON, DC, November 28, 2012 - On Monday, billionaire businessman Warren Buffett chimed in on the looming fiscal cliff crisis, where the United States will face steep domestic and military spending cuts to lessen the nation’s deficit unless Congress steps in with a plan.  In a New York Times piece, Buffett tackles the suggestion that increasing tax rates among the wealthiest Americans would defer investment by stating categorically that it does not. In a departure from the policy of his good friend and ally President Barack Obama, Buffett also suggested the President and Congress raise the threshold on household income that will be exempt from tax increases.

If Congress fails to come to a budget compromise, in addition to automatic domestic and military spending cuts, the so-called “Bush era tax cuts” will also expire for all Americans.  Obama wants to continue the Bush cuts for all except those earning $250, 00 or higher.

“I support President Obama’s proposal to eliminate the Bush tax cuts for high-income taxpayers,” Buffett wrote.“ However, I prefer a cutoff point somewhat above $250,000 — maybe $500,000 or so.”

Buffett may be on to something.  Given that the national median household income is $50,054, many find it hard to empathize with those households earning $250,000.  However, in certain parts of the country, a family of four in that bracket is not necessarily wealthy.

The after tax take-home pay for a family of four with two children earning $250,000 would be approximately 5800.00 net monthly before deductions.  A family living in an area with high real estate prices such as New York, San Francisco or Washington, DC, for example, could easily pay $3000 a month in mortgage for a modest sized cape cod style home in average, non upscale suburban neighborhood.

More than likely, high earners have graduate and post graduate degrees and may be saddled with student loan payments.  If both parents in the household are managing a college or grad school student loan balance of $400 a month each, that equals about $800 monthly. In many households with two working adults, it is not uncommon for there to be two automobiles, possibly leased for a total of about $800 per month. These may not be high end luxury vehicles but perhaps a reasonable mid-level sedan and a family minivan. Depending on the level of schooling or if the children are in private schools, they may  have childcare or school expenses of approximately, $800. That would leave  $400 to go towards health and life insurance, credit cards bills,  monthly utilities, phone and other monthly expenses, and that is hardly enough to cover those costs. Certainly, that is not enough and which means any income above the $250,000 to meet these other expenses will be subject to additional taxation come January 1, 2013.

Based on such a hypothetical scenario, slightly over $250,000 earners should not be categorized as “wealthy” as they too could be detrimentally harmed by having their tax rates go up. It would have nothing to do with less investment or job creation, but basic human living standards and expenses.

While there are some who will believe that Americans earning in the range slightly above $250,000 are living above their means and not deserving of continuing tax relief, they too could face challenges if their tax rates go up in January 2013.  They may be homeowners, with the privilege of having health insurance benefits, but their standard of living may not be ostentatious as compared to other lower income families.  Yet because of some arbitrary figure, they could be subject to higher rates.

They will be punished for choosing to invest in education and homeownership. 

Buffett is on to something. Raising the income level tax relief would spare the millions of middle income Americans that have household income between $250,000 and $500,000.

That is the least that can be done considering that these households contribute between $75,000 to $100,000 in taxes to the government which then uses some of that money to subsidize living standards for others earning substantially less. 

 


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Politics of Raising Children
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Jeneba Ghatt
Jeneba Jalloh Ghatt is a former journalist turned lawyer turned citizen journalist. Currently, she manages her boutique communications law firm, where she has represented small businesses and nationally-recognized civil and consumer rights organizations before the United States Supreme Court, federal courts and the FCC. She also covers the White House and US Congress for the online news site Politic365.com while authoring her own influential blog JenebaSpeaks.com which is frequently accessed by top policy makers and think tanks, and the investment community. JenebaSpeaks.com focuses on the intersection of politics and technology and reports on policies and rules in the communications and tech sector.
 
Before opening her law firm, The Ghatt Law Group, which was the first communications firm owned by women and minorities, Jeneba regulated Comcast and Starpower as the Assistant General Counsel for the District of Columbia's Office of Cable Television and Telecommunications, and at one point was the only communications regulatory attorney in the entire city. She is founding member and policy chair for a new trade association, the National Association of Multicultural Digital Entrepreneurs and provides advice and counsel to new businesses in the tech industry, particularly small businesses owned by women and minorities.

Born in Sierra Leone, West Africa, but raised in the United States by her Catholic mom and Muslim dad, she started her college career creating web content for one of the earliest websites in history while working part time for the University of Maryland's Office of Technology. Following her graduation from the Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law, she founded and co-wrote one of the earliest blogs and since then has gone on to found and author six different widely read and influential blogs. She was one of only 22 writers and bloggers to attend the first White House summit for African American media.
 
She holds a Certificate in Communications Law Studies from Catholic; a Juris Doctor from there as well, and a Master of Law in advocacy degree from the Georgetown University Law Center where she first taught and lectured as a Staff Attorney and Graduate fellow at that law school's Institute for Public Representation. She later went on to teach Media Law at the University of Maryland at College Park and guest lecture at Yale Law School and Penn State University, College of Telecommunications. She is well skilled and versed with social media and manages several Twitter, Facebook, Linked In accounts and groups.
 
She sits on the board of several non profits and trade associations.

Contact Jeneba Ghatt

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus