Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter movie is ridiculous

The movie based on the best seller is pretty ridiculous. Photo: 20th Century Fox

OKLAHOMA CITY, June 25, 2012—“What is this?”, “Well Hollywood has run out of ideas”, and laughter were all heard after the Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter trailer played in local cinemas.

“This looks like the dumbest movie” and “I guess they are trying to make more money off Twilight,” are some of the Facebook posts that came across your newsfeed.

The truth is Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter is a movie based on a very smart book by  Seth Grahame-Smith who also wrote the screenplay.

The story centers on a secret diary by our 16th President about his mother being killed by a vampire when he was a boy, and his subsequent decision to dedicate his life to revenge her killing. The Civil War? Vampires run the South feasting on slaves. Take history and fill in the gaps with fiction.

As the title illustrates, you must be willing to suspend a certain amount of disbelief to appreciate the film.  And to say that the movie is ridiculous means you just didn’t get it. Well, the movie is ridiculous.

The first few scenes look like something from Walker, Texas Ranger as a young Lincoln defends a young African-American child from getting whipped. Lincoln (Benjamin Walker) grows up and meets Henry (Dominic Cooper) who teaches him how to wield an axe and hunt vampires.

A common criticism of books adapted for screen is always “The book was better,” but in this case the author wrote the screenplay so the adaptation should be more faithful to the book. There are elements of the book in the movie, but there are a few stark differences, like adding the Will character (Anthony Mackie) that simply are unnecessary.  At one point, Lincoln chases a vampire on the back of a pack of wild horses. Ridiculous.

Timur Bekmambetov (Wanted) directed the movie, so it goes without saying that the fight scenes are pretty cool. Cutting through a tree with an axe in one swipe? Cool.

Without ruining the movie, or the book, one of the best parts of the book was the ending. Unfortunately, that highlight — what Henry decides to do with Lincoln after he is shot — is basically ignored. In fact, the assassination and John Wilkes Booth aren’t even in the movie.

Disappointing for sure, but not terrible. There a few parts that make the movie worth watching, but for those looking for something different and smarter than other vampire movie adaptions will have to keep on looking.

 


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Movies in Total
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Jason Black

Jason Black is a graduate of the University of Oklahoma where he recieved a B.A. in Journalism.  While at OU he served as Sports Director for the University television station.  He has recieved multiple awards for public speaking and comedy.

He appears weekly on 18 radio stations across the country and also writes for the magazine distinctly Oklahoma.

Growing and living in Oklahoma for almost his entire life, Jason has a passion for all sports mixed with a little pop culture.

Contact Jason Black

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus