Holder's race agenda may retry Zimmerman on civil rights violations

In acquitting Zimmerman of murder, a jury decided that the death of Trayvon Martin was not racially motivated. DOJ disagreeing? Photo: Eric Holder / Associated Press

WASHINGTON, July 20, 2013 — One of the Obama Administration’s 2008 platforms was that his administration would would heal racial division in America. Far from healing racial divide, and even though a Florida court jury found George Zimmerman second-degree murder and manslaughter in the killing of Trayvon Martin,an unconstitutional example of double jeopardy, George Zimmerman may be tried a second time for the same crime by Obama’s Justice Department.

The excuse being floated for that is that the first time Zimmerman was charged with second degree murder, while this brand spanking new charge will be “violating Trayvon Martin’s civil rights.”

SEE RELATED: SIEGEL: DOMA and Prop 8: Are the courts replacing democracy?

Supposedly, Zimmerman was more than an overly ambitious volunteer night watchman with a hero complex. He went after Martin simply because the young teen was black.

A decision has not yet been made, but President Obama’s finest appointee, Attorney General Eric Holder, is actively looking into the matter. And it will be very interesting to see if Holder can use anything other than racially motivated emotion, vs. law, to pursue additional charges against Zimmerman when the jury in Zimmerman’s trial found that that state failed to prove any racial motive.

Few people separate Eric Holder from his boss, however Obama’s press secretary is making every attempt to do so creating a veil of plausible deniability by saying:

“This is a decision made by the Justice Department by career prosecutors,” Jay Carney said when asked if Obama was going to weigh in on the verdict.”This is not something the president involves himself in.”

SEE RELATED: Siegel: PRISM, Orwell, Obama, security and freedom

That is a less than genuine statement for Carney to make as Obama interjected himself into the discussion back when the tragic shooting first occurred by saying “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon,” or more recently “Trayvon Martin could have been me.”

Inasmuch as Trayvon’s picture does not particularly resemble Obama, the strange statement sounds like the kind of racist remark liberals love to accuse conservatives of. Does Martin look like Obama’s son only because they share the same skin color? Are the similar because teen Obama liked to wear hoodies, and, as he has admitted, smoke marijuana? 

Can you just imagine the media buzz had George Bush identified with a dead teenager simply because the man was white? Chris Matthews would have a whole month’s supply of editorial soliloquy.

Whatever the interpretation of Obama’s comment, it is serving to fuel racial discussion into an incident that originally had nothing to do with race. If one year later, Obama now wants to stay out of it, that’s great.

SEE RELATED: IRS, Obama, and plausible deniability

It’s also too little, too late.

Prior to Carney’s remarks, Obama said, “I know this case has elicited strong passions. And in the wake of the verdict, I know those passions may be running even higher … But we are a nation of laws, and a jury has spoken. I now ask every American to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son.”

That sounds good, Mr. President. So how about following through by reigning in your attorney general?

While considering charging Zimmerman all over again, this time with a civil rights charge, Holder said, “We are determined to meet division and confusion with understanding and compassion — and also with truth … We are resolved, as you are, to combat violence involving or directed at young people, to prevent future tragedies and to deal with the underlying attitudes, mistaken beliefs and stereotypes that serve as the basis for these too common incidents. And we will never stop working to ensure that — in every case, in every circumstance, and in every community — justice must be done.”

“Truth” is not the first word that pops to mind when people think of Eric Holder. That particular quality seemed absent when he testified about Fast and Furious and the AP/Fox scandals.

Neither did Holder see to it that “justice must be done” when people complained about voter intimidation by the New Black Panthers. Samir Shabazz, head of the Black Panthers chapter in Philadelphia, was caught on a 2010 video holding a baton in front of a voting poll and shouting racial slurs while explaining to a reporter that he was there for “security.”

Another video actually shows him calling for the murder of white babies. “You want freedom? You’re gonna have to kill some crackers! You’re gonna have to kill some of their babies.” (National Geographic interview, 2009)

This man and other Black Panthers were prosecuted by the Bush Administration. Then Obama became president. Under Holder’s leadership of the DOJ, the government dropped all charges.

Is this Holder’s idea of equal and compassionate justice?

Nothing here should be a surprise. Where racial relations are concerned, Holder, right from the start, has displayed more of an agenda and less of an interest in truth.

One of his early comments after being appointed attorney general was that “America needs to have a serious conversation about race” (Speech before Department of Justice, Feb 18, 2009).

Those insightful words were delivered right after we elected our first African-American president.

Not that our country needed to prove that we had already abandoned the legal persecution of African-Americans long ago, but this was the liberal litmus test: “Hey America, are you finally going to rise above your racism and elect a black man?”

And then, after Obama’s election, the first thing we heard from our new attorney general was that we were still a racist country needing to have a dialogue.

When Martin’s friend said under oath that he described Zimmerman as a white cracker, was that racism?

When white people are beaten up in riots only to he hear the words, “That’s for Trayvon Martin,” are we witnessing racism? Even if Zimmerman had been a racist, would that mean that all white people are guilty and deserving of equal punishment?

On the other hand, was Zimmerman dubbed ‘racist’ only because of shameless race baiting?

When the New York Times learned that Zimmerman was part Hispanic they still went out of the way to call him a “white Hispanic” and, in doing so, painted the case in terms of white against black, was that race baiting?

When the original 911 recording showed that Zimmerman made no mention of Martin’s skin color until asked by the dispatcher and NBC News edited the tape to make it sound as if Zimmerman was profiling Martin simply because of color, was that race baiting? 

A jury decided that the unfortunate death of Trayvon Martin was not race baiting.

Eric Holder’s agenda may attempt to prove otherwise. 

This is Bob Siegel, making the obvious, obvious.

Bob Siegel is a radio talk show host and columnist. Information about his radio show can be found at www.bobsiegel.net.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Forbidden Table Talk
blog comments powered by Disqus
Bob Siegel

A graduate of Denver Seminary and San Jose State University, Bob Siegel is a radio talk show host and popular guest speaker at churches and college campuses across the country, using a variety of media including, seminars, formal debates, outdoor open forums, and one man drama presentations.

In addition to his own weekly radio show (KCBQ 1170, San Diego) Bob has been a guest on many other programs, including The 700 Club, Washington Times Radio's Inside the Story, The Rick Amato Show, KUSI Television's Good Morning San Diego, and the world popular Jonathan Park radio drama series, for which Bob guest starred in two episodes and wrote one episode, The Clue From Ninevah.

Bob is a regular contributor for San Diego Newsroom and San Diego Rostra. Bob does a good deal of playwriting as well (14 plays & 5 collaborations), including the award winning, Eternal Reach.  Bob has also published two books;  A Call To Radical Discipleship, and I'd Like to Believe In Jesus, But...

Contact Bob Siegel


Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus