The Washington Times Online Edition

The Institution Gap


Some people rely on institutions more than others.  It is another of the disparities in our society.Photo: 19melissa68 (Flickr)
School's Closed

Some people are more institution dependent than others.  I have come to believe that this is one of the many growing disparities that exist in our society.  People talk about the education gap, the technology gap, the income gap.  The same divide exists when it comes to institutions.

Some people are dependent upon institutions to do things for them.  Other people use institutions to augment what they can do for themselves.  The trend is moving toward more people being less dependent upon institutions as I explained in my post A Citizen Centric World.  But, the transition is not complete.  Many people still rely heavily on the work of institutions.

The institution gap comes into stark relief when one works in the realm of k-12 education.  Low income students tend to be far more institution dependent than their high income peers.  That’s a generalization, of course, but one that typically plays out in practice.

Low income students do not have access to the same sorts of learning opportunities outside of school as their peers.  Private tutoring in the basics is not an affordable option for many families.  Working parents have less time to read to their children and help with homework.  What’s more, students whose families lack resources aren’t able to participate in activities such as scouts, go to museums or go on vacations to a variety of destinations as easily as their higher income peers.

The result is that low income students fall behind during breaks from school.  As Malcolm Gladwell wrote in his book, Outliers, “America doesn’t have a school problem.  It has a summer (vacation) problem.”

That is why there is a growing consensus that the best way to serve low income students is to intensify their institutional experience.  Schools that are celebrated as being “no excuses” schools, helping at-risk students lift themselves to levels of achievement they might not have previously imagined, have one thing in common.  Almost all of these schools require longer school days, weeks and years.

Here’s the rub:  In many school districts across the country, there is a bias toward sameness, meaning that all students should be treated essentially the same – especially in terms of time and resources.

What’s more, it has been my experience, that high income families do not want their children to have more intense institutional learning experiences.  They want the opposite.  Even trial balloons of increasing the days and hours students are required to attend schools raises concerns among higher income parents.  A majority of “voters” on a Parade Magazine’s website poll oppose extending the length of the school year.  The result doesn’t surprise me.

U.S. students spend far fewer days in school than their peers in many countries.  Countries whose students perform better on standardized tests than American students go to school as much as 40 more days per year according to the National Center on Time and Learning. These types of statistics don’t tend to impress American parents.  Comparisons to other countries do little, if anything, to sway attitudes.

Higher income parents want their children to have the flexibility to pursue handpicked learning experiences in the afternoons, on the weekends and over the long summer break.  Mandatory time at school is seen as an obstacle to enrichment not as an opportunity to boost student achievement.

Here’s another rub: Families that are institution dependent don’t tend to vote and don’t tend to lobby members of the school board.  Families that are less institution dependent do vote and are vocal.  Political pressure tends to lead people in leadership positions to focus more on the needs of vocal, voting families and less on silent, non-voting families.

There are no silver bullets to improving education.  Increasing the number of days students attend school alone will not provide the educational lift that many students need to flourish in later life.  But, arguing over school days is not really the point I wish to debate.  The point is that some people do need institutional support than others.  But, there is a lack of political will to provide this help.

Public leaders need to find ways to combat the bias toward sameness so that we can provide people with the support they need.

*     *     *

John Creighton writes on community life and public leadership at johncr8on.com.  He can be found on Twitter @johncr8on and on Facebook.

Picture Credits: School’s Closed by Flickr user 19melissa68.

This article is the copywritten property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media.

REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Dispatches From The Heartland
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
John Creighton

John is a student of community life and public leadership. He does research, writes, speaks and advises public leaders on strategies to activate citizens to take action.

John's professional journey includes twenty years work with public-oriented organizations including the U.S. Bureau of Primary Health Care, American Society of Newspaper Editors, Kettering and C.S. Mott Foundations, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Demos Public Works Project and many Pulitzer prize-winning newspapers.  John is the former director and senior fellow with The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation.  As founder of Conocer, John designed a peer-to-peer learning network for forty-plus primary health care associations around the country.  He began his career working on the staff of two Kansas gubernatorial campaigns.

John is author or more than forty reports and articles. He has been a keynote speaker for groups ranging from the Western Governors Association, Nature Conservancy, National Association of Secretaries of State, Mid America Press Institute, Greater Midwest Association of Primary Health Care Centers, and the Poynter Institute for Media Studies.

One of John's joys is the opportunity to interview Americans from all walks of life.  He has had the privilege to sit down with such diverse groups - in such diverse places - as executives in the World Trade Center; community health care workers in South Carolina; AME church members in Atlanta; ranchers in North and South Dakota; union members in Flint, MI; casino workers in Las Vegas; newspaper reporters in Baltimore; media pioneers in California, and countless others in 42 states.

John grew up in a small town on the Great Plains where he learned community is not a concept but a rewarding, and practical, way of life.  John is a graduate of the University of Kansas and Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.  He and his wife Joni are raising three children in Longmont, Colorado where John serves on the school board.

Contact John Creighton

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Who We Are

This is the Communities at WashingtonTimes.com. Individual contributors are responsible for their content, which is not edited by The Washington Times. Contact Us with questions or comments.

Get The Most Up-To-Date News From The Washington Times Communities.

* required
Most Read
    Featured Neighborhoods
    Photo Galleries