Rand Paul filibusters Brennan nomination over drone policy

Sen. Rand Paul's filibuster of John Brennan continues into the night, despite efforts by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Photo: James Crisp/Associated Press

WASHINGTON, March 6, 2013 ― With impeccable timing, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) launched a filibuster this morning as snow descended upon Washington D.C. Paul began his filibuster in an effort to draw attention to the issue of drone strikes on American soil. Paul has demonstrated reservations against Obama’s nomination of John Brennan for CIA director due to Brennan’s strong support of the drone program Paul opposes.

For weeks, Paul had been asking the Obama administration for an official response in regards to the constitutionality of a drone strike on an American citizen on American soil. “We’re talking about someone eating at a café in Boston, or New York and a Hellfire missile comes raining in on them,” said Paul in a letter to Brennan’s office. His inquiries were mostly ignored.


SEE RELATED: On drones, Senator Rand Paul is a marathon man


Previously this week, Attorney General Eric Holder finally returned a letter to Paul arguing that drone strikes on American soil were “entirely hypothetical” and “unlikely.” This message, however, only seemed to make the issue worse, as Paul insisted on confirmation that a drone strike of this nature would be unjustified and unconstitutional.

Although Paul has been attempting to raise the issue for a few days, media coverage was slim. That changed today as #filiblizzard and #randpaul took Twitter by storm. Conservatives across the country rallied to support Paul, as Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) joined in for support. At one point, the filibuster took on a bipartisan nature when Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) joined in. Although Wyden had previously expressed support for Brennan’s nomination, he articulated similar concerns with the drone policy. “I want it understood that I have great respect for this effort to really ask these kinds of questions … And Sen. Paul has certainly been digging into these issues in great detail.”

Paul began the filibuster with, “I will speak until I can no longer speak. I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court.”

Although this type of speaking filibuster has not been used since December 2010, the filibuster has remained an important characteristic of Senate practice.


SEE RELATED: CPAC: Rand Paul and Chris Christie, opportunity and setbacks


After Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) failed to end the filibuster, he dismissed the other senators: “Everyone should plan on coming tomorrow. We’re through for the night.” Paul will continue speaking into the night.


READ MORE: Consider Again



This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from Consider Again
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Danny Huizinga

Danny Huizinga is currently studying at Baylor University, pursuing three business majors in Economics, Finance, and Business Fellows with minors in mathematics and political science. Although originally from the Chicago area, he is a Texas resident. Danny writes a political blog called Consider Again located at consideragain.com and is also syndicated at The College Conservative, RedState, PolicyMic, and the Baylor Lariat.


Follow him on Twitter or Google+

Contact Danny Huizinga

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus