OCALA, Fla., September 27, 2013 — Over the last few years, bands of hardline, if not self-destructive, activists have attempted to remake the Republican Party in their own image.
This image is hard-right. What has come out of the GOP lately might be described as the John Birch Society meeting Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority at a Libertarian Party conference.
“Far out” doesn’t even begin to describe it.
Modern rightist operatives often claim that they are bringing the Republican brand back to its roots. They then say that anyone who is not of their ideology is a “RINO”; Republican In Name Only. RINOs, in many instances, are treated worse than far-left Democrats for whatever reason.
The question is this: Are rightists actually crusading for the historical GOP? Was the Republican Party once the exclusive home of our nation’s right-wing?
Of course not.
Today’s partisan alignment of “conservatives” and “liberals” only came about after Richard Nixon’s presidency. Prior to that, both the Democratic and Republican parties boasted a healthy variety of governing philosophies.
Conformism was for small minds back then. It still is now, but few notice. In a world where Ted Cruz and Debbie Wasserman Schultz reign, can anyone be surprised?
Since the Civil War Era, the Democratic Party has represented folks who harbor politically-relevant grievances. The GOP, meanwhile, stood for and still champions the preservation of socioeconomic norms.
This does not mean that the Democrats were progressives, and the Republicans reactionaries. Far from it.
Many Democrats, who were either of Scots-Irish, Irish Catholic, or some other ethnic European heritage, had fiercely conservative ideas on social policy. Because of their relative material poverty, however, most were sympathetic to fiscal leftism.
Republicans, on the other hand, were mainly capitalistic Anglo-Saxon Protestants and, though they were small in number, Reform Jews.
Both WASPs and Reform Jews tended to be on the wealthier side, and valued intellectual inquiry. Secularism came with the territory, as did libertarian ideas regarding social issues. The society which they created in places like New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and San Francisco, among others, was a continuation of the high European tradition.
Democrats, who also included WASPs and virtually all others from the Civil War-ravaged South, were resentful of the GOP establishment. Eventually, a building block set of ethnic groups formed under the guise of making friends the enemy of one’s enemy.
Though Democratic constituencies usually had little in common with one another, they all wanted a slice of America’s storied apple pie. Many also planned on enshrining the values of their ancestral homeland into this country’s public policy. Such a thing was the forerunner to present-day multiculturalism.
While the years passed and alliances shifted, sometimes radically, one thing never failed to remain the same. It is quite simple: The Democratic Party is backed by individuals who want change, and the Republican Party is supported by folks who long for things to remain the same.
Right and left — much less conservatism, liberalism, progressivism or libertarianism — are irrelevant to this.
So, in a comprehensive sense, neither of America’s major political parties can be deemed left or right. They sure do have a record of despising one another, though.
That never fails to shine through, unfortunately.
Far-left? Far-right? Get real: Read more from “The Conscience of a Realist” by Joseph F. Cotto
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.