O'Reilly and Romney really were right: America is becoming a welfare state

The truth might make the Republican Party unelectable, even though Obamacare is extremely unpopular. Photo: Associated Press

OCALA, Fla., November 26, 2013 — As the controversy over Obamacare builds, many Republicans have come to believe that their party will prosper as a result.

This may be true in next year’s midterm elections, which typically have low turnout rates, but the presidential race may be a different story.

Last year, as election returns were trickling in, television host Bill O’Reilly remarked that America is a changing country. This was in reference to the fact that an increasing number of people are dependent on direct government assistance — 49.1 percent in 2011 versus 30 percent in 1983. 

Combine that with the unremarkable assertion that people tend to vote their pocketbooks, and you have increasing voter support for candidates who promise to continue and expand that assistance. 

Exit polls showed that 20 percent of voters in 2012 had an annual income below $30,000. Sixty-three percent of those supported President Barack Obama, while 35 percent went for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. When a politician finds such overwhelming traction within a group, coincidence is not the reason.

This should have been evidence enough to support O’Reilly’s argument. Like clockwork, however, our nation’s media hounds exploded in fury.

SEE RELATED: ‘Catch an illegal’ college games won’t stop immigration amnesty

Mitt Romney joined O’Reilly in stating the obvious in a conference call several days after his defeat. In so many words, he credited Obama’s second term to the allotment of “gifts” for key members of the latter’s electoral coalition. These gifts, of course, came in the form of direct public assistance programs.

The unfortunate reality is that emotionalism has taken a firm hold of our country’s political arena. Aside from the ever-expanding welfare state, we vote our beliefs and cherry pick information to confirm our ideas. Prior to the 2012 elections, people on the right were highly prone to this, so lost in confirmation bias that some believed Obama would lose in a landslide. 

The data suggesting otherwise were in front of them all the time, but they refused to see it.

Now, an alarming number of people on the left knowingly ignore the glaring statistics. This is understandable, as the data don’t entirely support the version of reality they prefer, but it’s still an unhealthy way to look at the world. 

A major reason for centrism’s contemporary decline is that it offers little room for the this kind of emotionalism. It should come as no surprise that most of O’Reilly’s and Romney’s detractors are either well to the left or to the right. 

It is this atmosphere which the GOP not only must deal with, but conquer. If such a feat can’t be accomplished, then the Republican brand is finished in the long run.

Considering that the GOP is now at war with itself, how can it earn serious consideration on the national stage? Should economic demographics fail to make Republicans unelectable, then they will probably finish the job themselves.

Talk about a bleak future.


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from The Conscience of a Realist
blog comments powered by Disqus
Joseph Cotto

Joseph F. Cotto is a social journalist by trade and student of history by lifestyle choice. He hails from central Florida, writing about political, economic, and social issues of the day. In the past, he was a contributor to Blogcritics Magazine, among other publications. He is currently at work on a book about American society.

Contact Joseph Cotto


Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus