Hugo Chavez: The international man of misery remembered

Now that the infamous Venezuelan ruler has died, it would be wise to consider the true meaning of his legacy. Photo: Mourners line up Thursday, March 7 to view Hugo Chavez's body AP

FLORIDA, March 7, 2012 — Hugo Chavez has finally gone to join the Great People’s Labor Revolution in the sky or deep under the ground, depending on your point of view.

We should all agree that the world will never be the same without him. It is difficult to see how the jumble of socialists running most of Central and South America can find a more captivating leader for transnational leftism. The bipartisan establishment on Capitol Hill is surely singing hymns of joy as one of the United States’s greatest foreign policy foes is no more. Antipoverty activists in slums and institutions of higher learning everywhere are certain to lionize Hugo in the same way that they have Che Guevara and Salvador Allende.

One must not forget the so-called democracy movement in the Middle East. Chavez was enormously popular with most of its participants. If Bashar al-Assad is ultimately dethroned, might a grand statue of Chavez be constructed in Damascus? The Arab Spring could have more surprises yet.

From my perspective, Chavez was the quintessential spokesman for not only militant socialism, but modern Third World politics. He dressed in a brightly colored tracksuit while others wore jackets and neckties. He spoke in an unpolished and hyperbolic manner when gentility would have sufficed. He used a blend of theological and secular mysticism to control a large bloc of Venezuela’s easily led and even more easily riled underclass. 

That’s not even considering the man’s physical appearance. He always had an unkempt look about him, which seemed to generate a perverse sort of pride. It was as if he embodied the very concept of mediocrity and championed it no end.

Looks aren’t everything, though. We must not forget that as ugly as Chavez was, his agenda was even uglier. In the name of social justice and total equality, he banned critical media reports and nationalized anything that he desired. In the name of peace and human rights, he formed allegiances with some of the worst dictators on the face of the earth. In the name of Christianity and spirituality, he manipulated Roman Catholic doctrine in order to rationalize his public policy initiatives.

Indeed, Chavez was one-of-a-kind. He was a power monger who knew not only how to exploit the fears and prejudices of Venezuela’s underclass, but the naiveté and self-loathing of Hollywood’s shining stars. Politicians here in the United States openly hailed the finer points of his economic plans. Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin went pretty far with their savagery, but they never managed anything like this.

So what were Hugo’s real motivations? Was he truly looking out for the underclass during his fourteen-year-plus rule? Did he first enter the political arena to support its interests? He to be a fundamentalist believer in the god of egalitarianism, which provides not for equality of opportunity, but equality of condition. He pursued the dream of robbing the haves so the have-nots could rejoice, and he never let go of this fantasy until his dying day.

Why did Chavez waste his time on such tripe? As the son of impoverished schoolteachers, he undoubtedly felt a strong sense of solidarity with society’s lowest strata. Rather than seeking out success, he vilified it whenever and wherever possible. Instead of trying to climb the latter, he became a victim to his own inferiority complex. He turned his personal misery into the prime directive for a cause which would bring misfortune to untold millions.

Interestingly enough, he masqueraded this wholesale regression as a progressive movement. It was a movement that would never fool all of the people all of the time, but just enough to make life a living hell for the country.

In retrospect, Chavez’s authoritarian fancies weren’t in line with the tolerance-and-love schtick of Socialism. He was probably more of a Communist with Stalinist aspirations. Whatever one should call him, his record speaks for itself. His legacy appears likely to be classified alongside those of Fidel Castro, Enver Hoxha, Robert Mugabe, and a painfully long list of others.

Now that we really think about it, even though I am no believer in the supernatural, Chavez is most definitely marching in the underground revolution.


Far-left? Far-right? Get real: Read more from “The Conscience of a Realist” by Joseph F. Cotto 


 


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from The Conscience of a Realist
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Joseph Cotto

Joseph F. Cotto is a social journalist by trade and student of history by lifestyle choice. He hails from central Florida, writing about political, economic, and social issues of the day. In the past, he was a contributor to Blogcritics Magazine, among other publications. He is currently at work on a book about American society.

Contact Joseph Cotto

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus