Gun control supporters are patriotic, too

Despite what some say, dedicated patriots can support gun control. Here's why. Photo: Associated Press

FLORIDA, January 13, 2013 — Most of us, regardless of our personal beliefs about gun control, want to build a safer and more prosperous nation. Standing on that common ground, we should address a common misperception.   

Quite often, Second Amendment hardliners — politicians, pundits, and ordinary folks alike — give the impression that those who support firearm regulations do not identify with this country’s rich heritage. The hardliners seem to believe that opposing the unrestricted manufacturing and sale of guns is suspect if one wishes to be considered a true-blue American. 

The fact that so many in our society distrust or dislike those who are not fundamentalists about the Second Amendment is very troubling. There is no valid reason for political disagreements to create such a massive divide. It bears repeating that each of us can get along well with those around us if we respect each other’s views.

An integral element of said respect is recognizing that millions do support gun control out of a sincere devotion to this country’s well being. Common sense as they see it tells them that the fewer privately owned firearms there are, the less gun-related crime there will be. 

Of course, the right to keep and bear arms must not be ignored or infringed. Decent, responsible people from coast to coast own guns. Whether for self-defense or sport shooting, they use their guns legally and safely.

In what civil society, though, is the private possession of assault weapons necessary? Gun control proponents do not see the value in allowing people to stockpile high-capacity ammunition clips and magazines, and their understanding of the Second Amendment does not lead them to believe that this is a constitutionally protected right. 

Simply by stating what seems to them obvious, people who support gun control become subject to smears and absurd allegations by those who see a different version of the obvious.

The position of this column is that legislation at the municipal, county, state, and federal levels will tackle the dangers of assault weapons. Others will disagree. However this debate resolves, if we respect each other’s views and understand that intelligent people of good will can disagree with us, our country will be more unified. That kind of tolerance is hard to come by in today’s political environment, however.

If those opposed to gun control would simply realize that the other side includes a lot of patriots, they would score a major victory for political moderation. Then, we could all appreciate and sensibly discuss the myriad of issues facing America’s future.

This sounds like a win-win for everybody. 


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from The Conscience of a Realist
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Joseph Cotto

Joseph F. Cotto is a social journalist by trade and student of history by lifestyle choice. He hails from central Florida, writing about political, economic, and social issues of the day. In the past, he was a contributor to Blogcritics Magazine, among other publications. He is currently at work on a book about American society.

Contact Joseph Cotto

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Question of the Day
Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus