The 60 hour workweek makes bad business sense

Comment | Tweet | Share | | | Email | More |
Do you think that a 60 hour workweek is good for your job or company? Maybe, if that number is reduced by 20.  Photo: Ford assembly line (Associated Press)

FLORIDA, May 5, 2012 — In today’s unbelievably competitive business climate, many overachievers might try to put in a 60-hour workweek. Aside from the obvious problems associated with this, such as chronic sleep deprivation and the ever present possibility of a mental breakdown, choosing to go the extra several miles can only seem good come promotion time, right?

Well, perhaps. Each boss has his or her own perspective on that. However, is this a good idea for the company in question’s overall productivity?

Not according to Geoffrey James, a writer for Inc. Magazine.

He cite a slew of studies to back up his finding. The most interesting of these is a comprehensive report on labor output conducted by the Ford Motor Company during the mid-1920s. It concluded that it would be best for management and assemblymen alike if the workweek were capped at a total of 40 hours. Interestingly enough, an additional 20 hours did cause an immediate increase in productivity, but this vanished within the span of about three weeks.

The same data apply to modern working conditions. 

What about the notion that countries that have extremely long workweeks are more competitive, then? James indicates that six of the ten nations deemed most competitive for business have laws in place that prohibit workweeks in excess of 48 hours.

Writing that “in every case (he has) personally observed, the long hours result in work that must be scrapped or redone,” James goes on to state that, “nobody should be apologizing for leaving work at a reasonable hour like 5:30 p.m. In fact, people should be apologizing if they’re working too long each week — because it’s probably making the team less effective overall.”

It is hard to argue with the facts. Hopefully, a sizable number of managers, business owners, board members, and corporate presidents will get the message. Who knows? Perhaps one of the key aspects in the new American economy will be higher profits through a more rested, energized workforce. This just might be one of the few bright spots worth looking ahead to as the Great Recession rolls along.  


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from The Conscience of a Realist
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Joseph Cotto

Joseph F. Cotto is a social journalist and student of history from central Florida. He writes about everything from political trends to men's fashion, but finds nothing to be more interesting than a good interview. In the past, he was a contributor to Blogcritics Magazine, among other publications. He is currently at work on a book about American society. 

Contact Joseph Cotto

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Who We Are

This is the Communities section at WashingtonTimes.com. Individual contributors are responsible for their content, which is not edited by The Washington Times. The opinions of Communities writers do not necessarily reflect the views of, nor are they endorsed by, The Washington Times. Contact Us with questions or comments.

Get The Most Up-To-Date News From The Washington Times Communities.

* required
Question of the Day

Are you prepared to survive a natural disaster?

View results

Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus