Two brothers, two flags and one battle in Port Royal

Comment | Tweet | Share | | | Email | More |
The Drayton Brothers --on opposite sides, even after death.

VIENNA, VA.—  November 8, 2010  —  Two brothers went to war, one with the Confederate Army, the other a Union naval officer.  One went north, one went south; both were involved in a naval battle of Port Royal, South Carolina, with which few are familiar, which resulted in a Union victory.  Even in death they lie on opposite sides of the Mason-Dixon Line.

Thomas F. Drayton

Thomas F. Drayton

The problem with Fort Royal was that the larger Union troops came into the battle with a significant edge over their Confederate opponents who manned two forts, one on either side of the Sound. Fort Walker on the south near Hilton Head, had 23 guns, with 18 of them directed toward the ocean and a fort with as many as 255 men. 

On the north, Fort Beauregard on Phillips Island, had 19 guns and a garrison of almost 150 men.  Blockading Union ships had patrolled the area throughout the war; it was difficult for the Confederate forces to come into the Sound to refuel or take on coal.

The Union naval forces who attacked them on November 7, 1861 came ‘loaded for bear,’ as they say.  The seamen, under the leadership of Flag Officer Samuel duPont, had a total fleet of 75 warships, and several thousand  Marines on board, augmented by an Army of 12,000.  The only equalizer was the prevailing opinion that naval forces could not outman and outgun land forces.  Probably no one really expected that duPont’s men would actually attempt an attack on two forts simultaneously, which was considered to be a project for ground troops.

Still the original battle plan on November 1 had to be abandoned when typical bad Atlantic coastal weather set in.  As anyone who has been on more than one Caribbean cruise can attest, the likelihood of strong winds and stronger seas is very likely as one passes Cape Hatteras. On this particular day, the storm was a good strong one, resulting in the naval fleet being scattered with several transport ships being sunk.  There would be no attacking the two forts for the time being, and it would be up to duPont to find a way to make it work or face a failure.

Percival Drayton c. 1864

Percival Drayton c. 1864

He was aware that Cape Hatteras had been successfully attacked three months earlier, and felt that by using the force and flexibility of the steam powered ships,  he could better take down the fort.  DuPont directed his ships to not stop for the actual attack, but to continue moving in such a way that they literally formed an elliptical shape at the mouth of the Sound. In this manner they could attack both Fort Wagner and Fort Beauregard almost simultaneously. This provided the ships the ability to bombard the land forts in a continual barrage, continuing this method as long as was needed.  It would be harder for the defenders in the fort to hit moving targets!

On November 7, his plan went into effect and the constant firing continued from 9:30 a.m. until 1:15 p.m.  as duPont led his squadron into the Sound.  The Rebels met this large force with four ships, a rather uneven match. It was not that much later that the  Union sailors saw that the garrison troops appeared to be retreating from Fort Walker,  a facet later substantiated when it was found that only three of the guns facing the attackers were still operable.

The losses were light on the Union side, only 31 had been killed or wounded. For the Southerners the figures were not as good since they counted 66 casualties. DuPont’s strategy had worked, Fort Walker was a shell of its former self and the Union Navy still had all of its ships.  Shortly thereafter, Fort Beauregard was abandoned. There was now no  hope that the Confederacy could prevent Union forces from coming into Port Royal Bay.

The net result was that the Union  ended up with an invaluable asset – readily accessible stations for coal and other supplies to keep the blockaders operating. It was a doubly essential area, being located between Charleston, SC and Savannah, GA.  And the Union troops  had verified their opinion that  these two garrisons were always low on ammunition and not staffed adequately.

They had been easy targets.

As to our two young brothers,  Brig. Gen. Thomas F. Drayton  of the 50th Georgia was a West Point graduate,   part of General James Longstreet’s troops, in charge of Fort Royal.  Thomas was the eldest, and after the war he went  to Mecklenburg County, North Carolina where he died in 1891 and is buried.

Marker at Port Royal commemorating the Drayton Brothers

Marker at Port Royal commemorating the Drayton Brothers

His brother, Commodore Percival Drayton, a midshipman, was Captain of the U.S.S. Pocahontas, which was one of the  Union fleet.  in fact it was to him that Admiral Farragut uttered his famous order, "Damn the torpedoes,full speed ahead!" He, too, survived the war but only barely, dying in August of 1865. 

He was buried in Laurel Hill Cemetery in Philadelphia. There stands today a historical marker in Beaufort County, SC, near the gated community of Port Royal Plantation, which reads as follows:

“To honor the memory of two gallant gentlemen of South Carolina. Thomas Fenwick Drayton;  Brigadier General, C.S.A. and his brother Commodore Percival Drayton, U.S.N., Captain of U.S.S. Hartford, and later the first Chief of Naval Operations.

The brothers met at the outbreak of hostilities, shook hands, and Each went the way his conscience directed.

Thomas elected to defend his State. Percival  to follow his flag.

On November 7, 1861 the brothers met in battle. Commander Percival Drayton, on the gunboat Pocahontas, attacked Fort Walker, on which General Thomas Drayton was in command.”

 

Follow the blog on FaceBook at Martha Boltz; reach me by email at MBoltz2846@aol.com



This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from The Civil War
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Martha M. Boltz

Martha Boltz is a frequent contributor  to the long running Civil War features in The Washington Times America At War feature in the print and online editions. She has been a regular contributor to the original Civil War Page and its successor page since 1994, and is a civil war buff, historian, and writer. "Someone said that if we don't learn about the past, we are condemned to repeat it," she said, "and there are lessons of all sorts inherent in this bloody four-year period of our country's history."  She is a member of several heritage and lineage groups, as well as the Montgomery County Civil War Round Table. Her standing invitation is, "come on down - check the blog - send me your comments and let's have fun with its history and maybe learn something at the same time."

 

Contact Martha M. Boltz

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Who We Are

This is the Communities at WashingtonTimes.com. Individual contributors are responsible for their content, which is not edited by The Washington Times. Contact Us with questions or comments.

facebookLike Us
Get The Most Up-To-Date News From The Washington Times Communities.

* required
Featured Neighborhoods
  • Riffs

    Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.

  • Middle Class Guy

    What does the middle-class conservative think about everything? Find out here.

  • Out On A Whim

    A weekly humor column about Americana, satirizing whatever seems worthy of kidding, including political inanity and insanity -- conservative, liberal and everything in between.

  • Sports Around

    Contributions to the Communities Sports desk from readers.

  • Stimulus That!

    Global economy, the civilizing power of markets and public morals.

Photo Galleries