Photo: author

UK HPA report on cell phones & health is not what it claims to be

The recent UK Health Protection Agency’s (HPA) Report ‘Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields’ by the Advisory Group on Non-Ionizing radiation (AGNIR) clearly misleads the public and decision makers alike. It claims to be a comprehensive review of studies published after 2003. It is by far not what it claims to be. Published 8:52 p.m. May 3, 2012 - Comments

Photo: author

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity in limelight in Norway - brought by an unlikely adversary

Former Head of the WHO EMF Project, Mike Repacholi, commented that the former Head of the WHO, Gro Harlem Brundtland, spread "fear of cell phones" Published 3:09 a.m. April 14, 2012 - Comments

Photo: author

You have been WARNED: Cell phone radiation is a possible carcinogen

The IARC has warned that cell phone radiation is a possible carcinogen. Why the warning was forgotten? Published 9:55 a.m. April 7, 2012 - Comments

Photo: author

European experts in disarray over EHS -- electromagnetic hypersensitivity

Four European experts consider that EHS, ailment allegedly caused by EMF, does not exist. Austrian physicians think the opposite and provide guidelines how to diagnose EHS. Is the science on EHS sufficiently reliable for any far reaching conclusions? I do not think so. New scientific approach is urgently needed. Published 10:56 a.m. April 1, 2012 - Comments

Photo: author

“Professional debunker” from Germany ridicules Yale study

Use of the headline "Mouse, phone call" (in German "Maus, Telefon!") in the German Die Zeit story attempts to ridicule Yale study on the effects of cell phone radiation on mouse fetuses. For me, the Die Zeit story ultimately ridicules not the Yale study, but also the debunker. Published 3:30 p.m. March 26, 2012 - Comments

Photo: author

Cell phone radiation during pregnancy: Effect on newborns needs authentic research

Users are continuously assured by the authorities that current cell phone radiation safety limits protect us all. The new study from Yale seriously questions this assumption. It is a wake-up call for research. Published 3:14 p.m. March 18, 2012 - Comments

Photo: author

New study from US NCI should make a big splash - but it isn't

NCI scientists conclude that the brain cancer rise trend in USA fits predictions made by INTERPHONE study. Published 7:28 a.m. March 14, 2012 - Comments

Photo: author

The "smart meters" deployment – beyond the point of no return

Health concerns are not sufficient to reverse or even slow down wireless technological development. The problem has become a policy and politics issue. Published 8:06 a.m. February 24, 2012 - Comments

Photo: graphic by author

Is the "smart meter" scare justified?

It is difficult to understand the scare and hype surrounding "smart meters". Radiation exposure is negligible. Published 12:00 p.m. February 18, 2012 - Comments

Photo: author

In Peer-Review we trust? Do peer-review journals perpetuate bad science

Should the general public trust in what peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals say? I recommend a "limited trust". Published 2:41 p.m. February 13, 2012 - Comments