Manny Ramirez walks away with a cloud over his head

Comment | Tweet | Share | | | Email | More |
Manny Ramirez tested positive again, but this time he chose to walk away from the game of baseball rather than face a 100-game suspension. Photo: Keith Allison/Flickr

WASHINGTON, April 9, 2011—Until yesterday, no one thought that anyone, including Manny Ramirez, could be that stupid. Didn’t he learn a lesson when he became the first MLB superstar to be hit with a significant suspension under the league’s substance-abuse policy? And why did he choose to finally retire rather than serve out a 100-game suspension?

Just walk away.

In every sport, outsiders seem willing to give one free pass. That illegal drug could have been applied without the athlete’s knowledge (as claimed by Barry Bonds); it could have been an ingredient in a hair-growth product (Zach Lund); or it could have been a contaminant in a steak (Alberto Contador). Okay, it’s not particularly plausible that Manny Ramirez’s doctor would have given Ramirez a women’s fertility drug, but hey, any excuse is valid. (For the record, Lund was suspended for his hair-product use, though absolved of knowingly cheating, and Contador was completely acquitted.)

Manny Ramirez

Manny Ramirez

Manny blew that pass. When he was suspended for the first time, 50 games back in May of 2009, it suggested to the sport that the drug policy actually worked, and might dissuade players away from drug use. Apparently not.

Just walk away.

Now, Ramirez’s credibility is shot, if the show-boater ever had any in the first place. Once is a mistake, anything else makes all accomplishments a fiction. Those five 40-homerun seasons and 555 career homers? Gone. Those 1800 plus runs batted in? Gone. Those 2500 hits? Gone. Those nine Silver Slugger awards and twelve All-Star selections? Gone.

Just walk away.

Ramirez shouldn’t be honored for deciding to reitre, but it might be the best choice. He may have made the decision to avoid shame, instead of out of personal responsibility, but there was hardly much of an alternative. If he had stayed, he probably would have been hit with the assumption that he didn’t care, and for some athletes that would be worse than death. Perhaps his career would have been effectively over after that long suspension anyway. He won’t answer that question, and he doesn’t need to. He’s chosen the best path away from all this.

Just walk away.

Read more of Arjuna’s baseball commentary at Baseball’s Labyrinth, and his fencing commentary at To The Point.

KB 4/11


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from The Sports Philosopher
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Arjuna Subramanian

Arjuna Subramanian is an aspiring baseball writer living in the Washington D.C. area.  He started his writing  with his blog Painting The Black on MLBlogs in May of 2009.  He fell in love with the sabermetric movement during the 2008-2009 offseason, and strives to provide balanced articles from both sides of the statistics/scouting divide.  

When not writing, watching/listening to baseball, over-analyzing his Chicago Cubs, staring in disbelief at the writing of Thomas Boswell, or keeping tabs on the latest Milton Bradley blowup, he can usually be found at the DC Fencers Club, where he is a competitive epee fencer.

Contact Arjuna Subramanian

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Who We Are

This is the Communities section at WashingtonTimes.com. Individual contributors are responsible for their content, which is not edited by The Washington Times. The opinions of Communities writers do not necessarily reflect the views of, nor are they endorsed by, The Washington Times. Contact Us with questions or comments.

Get The Most Up-To-Date News From The Washington Times Communities.

* required
Question of the Day

Should the Government track and store American's personal data in the name of security?

View results

Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus