Monday morning power rankings: Week 3

Comment | Tweet | Share | | | Email | More |
A day late, the third installment of the 2010 power rankings are here.  See which teams lead the field as one month of baseball nears completion.

WASHINGTON D.C., April 27th - Throughout the offseason, I was on a quest to find a formula to do my power rankings for me for the 2010 season.  So here’s the official disclaimer: I have not manually tweaked these power rankings in any way.  They were calculated by my formulas which will be detailed below.  Be advised that the first few weekly power rankings always look odd because of small-sample sizes.

Now that that’s out of the way, here are the power rankings for the third week of 2010.  These will be posted every Monday.

Team

wOBA +

FIP +

DRS+

Power Score

1. Cardinals (4)

98

126

180

314

2. Mariners (7)

91

97

237

306.5

3. Rays (3)

104

96

205

302.5

4. Rockies (10)

105

111

156

294

5. Twins (1)

108

109

149

291.5

6. Phillies (17)

107

100

168

291

7. Padres (18)

100

109

149

283.5

8. D-backs (12)

110

86

162

277

9. Athletics (8)

96

118

118

273

10. Indians (2)

89

93

180

272

11. Blue Jays (6)

97

101

143

269.5

12. Giants (14)

101

122

87

266.5

13. Rangers (9)

96

93

149

263.5

14. Cubs (15)

105

122

68

261

15. Yankees (24)

112

109

75

258.5

16. Braves (19)

94

113

87

250.5

17. White Sox (13)

95

115

81

250.5

18. Angels (5)

98

89

124

249

19. Nationals (23)

104

86

118

249

20. Mets (20)

93

109

68

236

21. Astros (25)

84

121

44

227

22. Reds (11)

95

88

81

223.5

23. Tigers (30)

106

98

37

222.5

24. Orioles (26)

93

103

37

214.5

25. Royals (29)

107

83

44

212

26. Brewers (21)

112

90

6

205

27. Dodgers (22)

108

92

6

203

28. Marlins (27)

97

100

0

197

29. Red Sox (28)

101

92

6

196

30. Pirates (16)

93

79

31

187.5

I took every team’s wOBA, FIP, and DRS and calculated each component against the average.  I then summed them, creating the power score.  I weighted them as 2/5 batting, 2/5 pitching, 1/5 fielding.  The main reason that the table looks off is because the DRS scores haven’t evened out yet.  Right now they have an incredibly large variance.

Notes

  • ·The biggest stock boost went to the Phillies and Padres, who moved to 6 and 7, from 17 and 18, respectively.
  • · The Rangers and White Sox continued their falls, Texas has gone from 4 to 13 in two weeks, and the ChiSox gone from 3 to 17 in that same span.  But the greatest drop of the week went to the Pirates (16 to 30).
  • · The divisions look balanced, only the NL West put more than two teams in the top 10
  • · Negative power scores were eliminated, I added a normalization constant to balance out negative DRS scores.

That’s all for today, check back next Monday for the week 4 power rankings.


This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from The Sports Philosopher
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Arjuna Subramanian

Arjuna Subramanian is an aspiring baseball writer living in the Washington D.C. area.  He started his writing  with his blog Painting The Black on MLBlogs in May of 2009.  He fell in love with the sabermetric movement during the 2008-2009 offseason, and strives to provide balanced articles from both sides of the statistics/scouting divide.  

When not writing, watching/listening to baseball, over-analyzing his Chicago Cubs, staring in disbelief at the writing of Thomas Boswell, or keeping tabs on the latest Milton Bradley blowup, he can usually be found at the DC Fencers Club, where he is a competitive epee fencer.

Contact Arjuna Subramanian

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Who We Are

This is the Communities section at WashingtonTimes.com. Individual contributors are responsible for their content, which is not edited by The Washington Times. The opinions of Communities writers do not necessarily reflect the views of, nor are they endorsed by, The Washington Times. Contact Us with questions or comments.

Get The Most Up-To-Date News From The Washington Times Communities.

* required
Question of the Day

Are you prepared to survive a natural disaster?

View results

Featured
Photo Galleries
Popular Threads
Powered by Disqus