Revised DSM criteria for autism raise questions


Comment | Tweet Share | | Email | RSS | More |    
The American Psychiatric Association has released their DSM-5 proposed criteria for autism spectrum disorder. Does eliminating subtypes such as Asperger's make autism diagnoses more precise, or does it rob individuals of their self-identity?

SILVER SPRING, Md. (1/29/11) — My son Jack has a diagnosis of PDD-NOS, short for pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified. Basically he's somewhere on the autism spectrum, often considered to be in the middle between Asperger's syndrome and classic autism, although individuals diagnosed as PDD-NOS are actually a very diverse group.

According to the DSM-IV, the most current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and considered the bible of standard criteria for the classification of mental disorders, PDD-NOS is one of five subtypes of autism. 

Revised DSM criteria

Revised DSM criteria

However, once the DSM-5—the upcoming revised edition of the manual—is released, PDD-NOS and its cousins, Asperger's syndrome, Rett's disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder and autistic disorder will disappear into an umbrella diagnosis of "Autism Spectrum Disorder."

The DSM-5 proposed revisions have just been released, sparking discussion on the merits and disadvantages of the changes, which propose to include "severity levels" to differentiate between individuals on the spectrum.

The American Psychiatric Association includes its rationale for doing away with more specific subtypes, claiming that "distinctions among disorders have been found to be inconsistent over time, variable across sites and often associated with severity, language level or intelligence rather than features of the disorder." What they mean is that individuals less severely affected might be considered Asperger's not because they meet the specific criteria of the syndrome, but because of their more moderate level of impairment.

The APA goes on to say that "because autism is defined by a common set of behaviors, it is best represented as a single diagnostic category." This common set of behaviors falls in the domains of social/communication deficits and fixated interests and repetitive behaviors. They also defend the new language with the somewhat bizarre argument that the prior criteria were "equivalent to trying to 'cleave meatloaf at the joints.'"

I haven't decided yet whether I agree with the changes or not. Because no one outside the autism community really understands what PDD-NOS is, I already just say that my son has autism. In fact, PDD-NOS can be almost as general a term as autism itself. I don't know that much will change for him. However, I think calling him "Level 1 ASD" will probably be just as confusing, possibly more so.

However, there are many individuals with autism, particularly those diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome, who strongly identify with their diagnosis. Many of these self-proclaimed "Aspies" understandably mourn the loss of Asperger's as a diagnosis. There is definite value in having pride of self-identity.

I doubt that the term "Asperger's" will wink out of existence once the DSM-5 is published, but I wonder if this will be the last generation of Aspies, without further formal diagnoses. Perhaps informal or self-diagnoses of Asperger's will add new members to the club.

There has also been speculation that some individuals could lose their autism diagnoses under the new guidelines, and that fewer people will be initially diagnosed. This would cause serious repercussions for children and adults in need of services who would no longer qualify without a diagnosis. Furthermore, girls and women are often overlooked because autism can manifest differently in them. The revised definitions do not address this.

The autism spectrum is already such a vast umbrella, I wonder if there are repercussions to eliminating the stripes that break up the current definition. While sharing much common ground, in many ways, my son is as different from individuals on the very severe end of the spectrum as he is from individuals not on the spectrum at all. Regardless, I certainly don't object to my son sharing a diagnosis with those on the severely affected end of the spectrum and, in fact, firmly believe that he should.

In the end, there are many ways to be autistic in this world. I wonder if maybe there is value in recognizing that.

 

Jean writes a personal blog at Stimeyland and an autism-events website for Montgomery County, Maryland, at AutMont. You can find her on Twitter as @Stimey. Read more of Jean's work at Autism Unexpected in the Communities at the Washington Times.

This article is the copywritten property of the writer and Communities @ WashingtonTimes.com. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media.

REPRINTING TWTC CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

More from
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Jean Winegardner

When Jean had her first child in 2001, "autism" was about the scariest word she could think of. Six years later when her second child was diagnosed with PDD-NOS, a form of autism, she was just happy to have a word to help him get the services he needed. Her autism journey has been full of tears, laughter, love and at least one attorney.

Jean blogs about her life with her autistic son, Jack, on her blog, Stimeyland. Her two neurotypical children, Sam and Quinn (one older, one younger than Jack), make frequent appearances there as well. Also at Stimeyland? Jean's quirky sense of humor.

She also runs AutMont, an events calendar listing autism-related events in Montgomery County, Maryland.

Raising a child with special needs is hard for so many reasons, but after living with Jack, Jean wouldn't trade him for anything in the world. Come along with Jean as she experiences the joys that come with parenting a special kid.

You can email Jean anytime at stimeyland at gmail dot com or follow her on Twitter, where, as "Stimey," she offers her world view in snippets of 140 characters or less.

Contact Jean Winegardner

Error

Please enable pop-ups to use this feature, don't worry you can always turn them off later.

Who We Are

This is the Communities at WashingtonTimes.com. Individual contributors are responsible for their content, which is not edited by The Washington Times. Contact Us with questions or comments.

Get The Most Up-To-Date News From The Washington Times Communities.

* required
Most Read
    Featured Neighborhoods
    • The Political Pro-Con

      Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

    • Talking Sense

      We’re human: we don’t always think things through, so we accept many ideas that are, well, ideas that are wrong. We also look past certain truths without recognizing them.

    • Rich like me

      An establishmentarian conservative, short on cash, but long on wisdom.

    • The Tygrrrr Express

      A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.

    • Ringside Seat

      Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.

    Photo Galleries